Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

‘True Indians don’t talk like that’: SC pulls up Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks

The apex court, however, stayed the proceedings initiated against the LoP in Lok Sabha in a Lucknow court

By The Assam Tribune
‘True Indians don’t talk like that’: SC pulls up Rahul Gandhi over Army remarks
X

A file image of Rahul Gandhi during a recent visit to Assam. (AT Photo)

New Delhi, Aug 4: "If you are a true Indian, you wouldn’t say such a thing,” the Supreme Court told Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday, criticising his alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army during the Bharat Jodo Yatra.

However, the court stayed the proceedings initiated against him in a Lucknow court. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government and the complainant in the case.

"You are leader of opposition. Why don't you say things in Parliament, why do you have to say it on social media?" the bench asked.

The top court continued, "How do you get to know that 2,000 sq km of Indian territory has been occupied by Chinese? Were you there? Do you have any credible material? Why do you make these statements without having any material? If you are a true Indian, you won't say such a thing."

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Gandhi, submitted if the leader of opposition cannot raise issues, it would be an unfortunate situation.

"If he can't say these things which are published in the press, then he can't be a leader of opposition," Singhvi submitted.

On the bench's true Indian remark, Singhvi replied,"It is also possible that a true Indian will say that our 20 Indian soldiers were beaten up and killed. This it is also a matter of concern."

The top court then said, "When there is a conflict across the border, is it unusual to have casualties on either sides?"

Singhvi said Gandhi was only on the point of proper disclosure and raising concerns about the suppression of information.

Justice Datta said being a responsible leader of opposition, Gandhi ought not have done it as there was a proper forum to raise such questions.

While agreeing that Gandhi could have made the comments in a better manner, Singhvi said the complaint was nothing but an attempt to harass the petitioner.

Singhvi referred to Section 223 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and said a prior hearing of the accused was mandatory before the court took cognisance of a criminal complaint, which was not done in the present case.

The top court then issued notice on the plea while seeking response in three weeks and stayed the proceedings in the Lucknow trial court.

Referring to Gandhi's remarks on the surgical strike and Operation Sindoor, BJP national spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla alleged that the Congress leader and his party "hate" Indian armed forces.

"Sena ka Apman Congress ki pehchan (Insulting the Congress is the hallmark of the Congress)," he said in a post on social media.

"Rahul and Congress hate Indian Armed Forces. Today SC has slammed him," he charged.

Another BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said on social media that the Supreme Court's poser to Gandhi about his claim exposed him. He said, "Supreme Court asks Rahul Gandhi - 'How did you know that China had occupied land?'"

PTI

Next Story