Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Kohinoor given to Britain by Punjab rulers: Govt tells SC

By The Assam Tribune
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print

NEW DELHI, April 18 - The 108-carat unique Kohinoor diamond estimated to cost over USD 200 million was neither stolen nor �forcibly� taken by British rulers, but given to East India Company by erstwhile rulers of Punjab 167 years back, the Government today told the Supreme Court, which wanted legal remedies to be kept open to get it back.

�Kohinoor cannot be said to be forcibly taken or stolen as it was given by the successors of Maharaja Ranjit Singh to East India Company in 1849 as compensation for helping them in the Sikh wars,� Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar told a Bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur.

On his part, Culture Minister Mahesh Sharma ruled out any action by his ministry to bring back the Kohinoor. He told reporters that if any call on the matter needs to be taken, it will be at the diplomatic level.

The apex court then asked whether the Government was willing to stake a claim to the Kohinoor, one of the most valuable diamonds in the world.

The Solicitor General told the apex court that the demand to get back Kohinoor have been raised time and again in Parliament.

�If we claim our treasures like Kohinoor from other countries, every other nation will start claiming their items from us. There will be nothing left in our museums,� Solicitor General said.

He said this was the stand of the Ministry of Culture while the response from the Ministry of External Affairs, which is also a party, is awaited.

Hearing a PIL seeking return of Kohinoor diamond to India from Britain, the Bench, also comprising Justice UU Lalit, then asked the Solicitor General to file a detailed reply within six weeks.

�We would like to know if there is a claim the Government wants to make? See, we are not inclined to dismiss this plea. If we dismiss it, that country (United Kingdom) may say that your Supreme Court has rejected the plea and it may lead to denial of the Government�s legitimate claim.

�You cannot afford dismissal as it may be treated as an obstruction in your way. You formulate a response and file it in six weeks,� the Bench observed. � PTI

More in Entertainment
Next Story
Similar Posts
Kohinoor given to Britain by Punjab rulers: Govt tells SC

NEW DELHI, April 18 - The 108-carat unique Kohinoor diamond estimated to cost over USD 200 million was neither stolen nor �forcibly� taken by British rulers, but given to East India Company by erstwhile rulers of Punjab 167 years back, the Government today told the Supreme Court, which wanted legal remedies to be kept open to get it back.

�Kohinoor cannot be said to be forcibly taken or stolen as it was given by the successors of Maharaja Ranjit Singh to East India Company in 1849 as compensation for helping them in the Sikh wars,� Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar told a Bench headed by Chief Justice TS Thakur.

On his part, Culture Minister Mahesh Sharma ruled out any action by his ministry to bring back the Kohinoor. He told reporters that if any call on the matter needs to be taken, it will be at the diplomatic level.

The apex court then asked whether the Government was willing to stake a claim to the Kohinoor, one of the most valuable diamonds in the world.

The Solicitor General told the apex court that the demand to get back Kohinoor have been raised time and again in Parliament.

�If we claim our treasures like Kohinoor from other countries, every other nation will start claiming their items from us. There will be nothing left in our museums,� Solicitor General said.

He said this was the stand of the Ministry of Culture while the response from the Ministry of External Affairs, which is also a party, is awaited.

Hearing a PIL seeking return of Kohinoor diamond to India from Britain, the Bench, also comprising Justice UU Lalit, then asked the Solicitor General to file a detailed reply within six weeks.

�We would like to know if there is a claim the Government wants to make? See, we are not inclined to dismiss this plea. If we dismiss it, that country (United Kingdom) may say that your Supreme Court has rejected the plea and it may lead to denial of the Government�s legitimate claim.

�You cannot afford dismissal as it may be treated as an obstruction in your way. You formulate a response and file it in six weeks,� the Bench observed. � PTI

More in Entertainment
Similar Posts